Bits and Pieces of Discourse Analysis
Salam folks!
Thank you for staying tune with this blog! In this section of blog, we intend to let you venture yourselves more into the Discourse Analysis course module, in depth, insha Allah.
Talking about Discourse Analysis.... Ah, discourse! What an elude term to be defined and captured. Or, rather, it inspires a whole mess of varying definitions -- most of which serve only to make it even more mysterious, more elusive!
However, in discourse analysis it is essential to acknowledge the difference between spoken words, painted pictures, tuned music, written sentences (and many more), thus different means of communication hold different ways of influence. It is also essential to acknowledge that texts are not meaningful individually: it is interconnected with other texts (Phillips N & Hardy C, 2002).
Discourse analysis is a qualitative method, which is more concentrating on meaning of data than to the generality of the data. The word discourse was first used in 1950’s Zellig Harris, but it became scientifically accepted in Europe through the writings of Michel Foucault in his book “The Archaeology of Knowledge” in 1969. There goes a 'lil bit of History there!
Discourse Again and Again!
Why is it so important for us to first, understand the nature of discourse? Because discourse can be anything from a grunt or single expletive, through short conversations and scribbled notes right up to novels or a lengthy legal case.
Discourse Analysis is the study of discourse, or language used by members of a speech community, it looks at both language form and function, and includes the study of both spoken interaction and written texts. Well.. To sound very intact, it is a cross-disciplinary field, originally developing from Sociolinguistics, Anthropology, Sociology and Social Psychology. Much language study and most of language teaching has always been devoted to sentences.
However, it is obvious that there is more to using language, and communicating successfully with other people, than being able to produce correct sentences.
We provide some illustrations below to give a clearer picture of what the whole idea of discourse is all about..!
Illustration 1
A.
Chicken marmalade. That’s a funny looking dress. Inconsistent. Come here honey. Discourse may be composed of one or more well-formed sentences which are grammatically correct. I hate that man! My toes hurt. Revenge. Who’s your great uncle?
B.
Zidane stood and waited to see what would happen, but he pulled off his captain’s armband, indicating that he knew he was going to be expelled. Argentine referee Horacio Elizondo consulted the assistant, then ran over to Zidane, reached into his back pocket for the red card and brandished it at the player. Zidane’s World Cup, and his career, were over. He trudged to the sideline, stripping the bandage off his wrist while doing so. He did not argue the call.
Now.. which of the above texts is more cohesive? Which is coherent? Which one is discourse?
A piece of language is said to be coherent (therefore discourse) if it has a discernible, unified meaning. A piece of discourse is said to be cohesive if its components (ie. sentences/phrases/words) are bound together through linguistic and non-linguistic features to form a unified whole.
To make it more understandable.. We must also know some components of discourse devices which enable us to identify meanings in discourse and to also be participative in a particular discourse, mentally and verbally. So.. Obviously, it is safe to say that Illustration B is more cohesive, coherent and can be called a discourse due to all the criteria mentioned!
Important Tools!
In Discourse Analysis, there are few important elements (or aspects) that are coming into picture upon completing the task of analysis and they are;
Cohesion and Cohesive Devices
i. verb formii. parallelism
iii. referring expressions
iv. repetition and lexical chains
v. substitution
vi. ellipsis
vii. Conjunction
i. Verb form
e.g.
Speaker 1: Right, who’s going to arrange the transport?
Well, someone’s gotta do it.
Speaker 2: I’m not going to.
Speaker 1: Come on, will you?
All the verbs are in the present. There is an apparent degree of formal connection between them, a way in which the first tense conditions all the others.
Speaker 1: Right, who’s going to arrange the transport?
Well, someone had gotta do it.
Speaker 2: I shan’t have been going to.
Speaker 2: Don’t! Come on, will you?
ii. Parallelism
e.g.
What links the sentences in the above discourse?
e.g.
A.
Georgie Porgie pudding and pie
Kissed the girls and made them cry
When the boys came out to play
Georgie Porgie ran away
B.
Speaker 1: We would like to take this opportunity to wish you the best of luck
Speaker 2: Go break a leg man!
iii. Referring expressions
e.g.
Then they burnt it.
Referring expressions can be anaphoric, cataphoric or exophoric
Anaphoric references are those that refer back to elements mentioned earlier in the discourse. (ana means “upwards” and phor means “to carry.”)
e.g.
The passengers presented themselves for checking before boarding the plane.
e.g.
Exophoric references are those that refer to elements outside the text. (exo means ‘outside’)
e.g.
Finally, on 7 May 1945, Germany surrendered to the Allied Forces
iv. Repetition and lexical chains
e.g.
Referring expressions, repetitions and elegant repetitions all establish cohesion by creating ‘chains’ of connected words/clauses. Such lexical chains can also consist of words that associate with each other by virtue of some formal semantic connection.
e.g.
v. Substitution
e.g.
Speaker 1: Which shirt shall I wear today?
Speaker 2: The maroon one.
Speaker 2: You also like that one then?
Speaker 1: Yes, I do! I think It suits you better.
Speaker 2: I think so too.
vi. Ellipsis
e.g.
Speaker 2: I bought jewelry and Zee [bought] clothes,
Speaker 3: Clothes? You already have more than enough [clothes], and you bought more [clothes]?
vii. Conjunction
e.g.
First, peel and clean the potatoes. Then bake them. A conventional oven is best. However, a microwave oven will also do. Potatoes burn easily, so make sure you keep a close watch on the timer!
All of the elements/aspects mentioned are also the ones that we learnt in our Discourse Analysis course (ENGL 4635) under the tutelage of Dr. Haja Mohideen, few semesters back. Hence, we think that it is important to include in this section.
We hope you are enlightened by what we share here, stay tune with the next entries for more info rmation on Discourse Analysis module.
Till then,
Wassalam.
Source taken from:
http://www.azlifa.com/discourse-and-pragmatics-lecture-1/
Discourse analysis is a qualitative method, which is more concentrating on meaning of data than to the generality of the data. The word discourse was first used in 1950’s Zellig Harris, but it became scientifically accepted in Europe through the writings of Michel Foucault in his book “The Archaeology of Knowledge” in 1969. There goes a 'lil bit of History there!
Discourse Again and Again!
Why is it so important for us to first, understand the nature of discourse? Because discourse can be anything from a grunt or single expletive, through short conversations and scribbled notes right up to novels or a lengthy legal case.
Discourse Analysis is the study of discourse, or language used by members of a speech community, it looks at both language form and function, and includes the study of both spoken interaction and written texts. Well.. To sound very intact, it is a cross-disciplinary field, originally developing from Sociolinguistics, Anthropology, Sociology and Social Psychology. Much language study and most of language teaching has always been devoted to sentences.
Discourse Analysis is the study of discourse, or language used by members of a speech community, it looks at both language form and function, and includes the study of both spoken interaction and written texts. Well.. To sound very intact, it is a cross-disciplinary field, originally developing from Sociolinguistics, Anthropology, Sociology and Social Psychology. Much language study and most of language teaching has always been devoted to sentences.
However, it is obvious that there is more to using language, and communicating successfully with other people, than being able to produce correct sentences.
We provide some illustrations below to give a clearer picture of what the whole idea of discourse is all about..!
Illustration 1
We provide some illustrations below to give a clearer picture of what the whole idea of discourse is all about..!
Illustration 1
A.
Chicken marmalade. That’s a funny looking dress. Inconsistent. Come here honey. Discourse may be composed of one or more well-formed sentences which are grammatically correct. I hate that man! My toes hurt. Revenge. Who’s your great uncle?
B.
Zidane stood and waited to see what would happen, but he pulled off his captain’s armband, indicating that he knew he was going to be expelled. Argentine referee Horacio Elizondo consulted the assistant, then ran over to Zidane, reached into his back pocket for the red card and brandished it at the player. Zidane’s World Cup, and his career, were over. He trudged to the sideline, stripping the bandage off his wrist while doing so. He did not argue the call.
Zidane stood and waited to see what would happen, but he pulled off his captain’s armband, indicating that he knew he was going to be expelled. Argentine referee Horacio Elizondo consulted the assistant, then ran over to Zidane, reached into his back pocket for the red card and brandished it at the player. Zidane’s World Cup, and his career, were over. He trudged to the sideline, stripping the bandage off his wrist while doing so. He did not argue the call.
Now.. which of the above texts is more cohesive? Which is coherent? Which one is discourse?
A piece of language is said to be coherent (therefore discourse) if it has a discernible, unified meaning. A piece of discourse is said to be cohesive if its components (ie. sentences/phrases/words) are bound together through linguistic and non-linguistic features to form a unified whole.
To make it more understandable.. We must also know some components of discourse devices which enable us to identify meanings in discourse and to also be participative in a particular discourse, mentally and verbally. So.. Obviously, it is safe to say that Illustration B is more cohesive, coherent and can be called a discourse due to all the criteria mentioned!
Important Tools!
In Discourse Analysis, there are few important elements (or aspects) that are coming into picture upon completing the task of analysis and they are;
Cohesion and Cohesive Devices
In Discourse Analysis, there are few important elements (or aspects) that are coming into picture upon completing the task of analysis and they are;
Cohesion and Cohesive Devices
A stretch of language becomes discourse when it has unity and coherence.
Coherence is achieved in discourse by contextual features outside the language as well as formal links within the discourse. Such formal links within text that links sentences/clauses are known as cohesive devices. The purpose of cohesive devices is to hold parts of the discourse together in order to achieve overall unity.
Among the most common cohesive devices are:
i. verb formii. parallelism
iii. referring expressions
iv. repetition and lexical chains
v. substitution
vi. ellipsis
vii. Conjunction
iii. referring expressions
iv. repetition and lexical chains
v. substitution
vi. ellipsis
vii. Conjunction
i. Verb form
Cohesion is attained in a piece of discourse by the forms of the verbs used. The form of the verb in one sentence limits the choice of verbs form in the next. Depending on the time frame to which the piece of discourse alludes, the verbs used in it need to conform to the particular tense.
e.g.
Speaker 1: Right, who’s going to arrange the transport?
Well, someone’s gotta do it.
Speaker 2: I’m not going to.
Speaker 1: Come on, will you?
Speaker 1: Right, who’s going to arrange the transport?
Well, someone’s gotta do it.
Speaker 2: I’m not going to.
Speaker 1: Come on, will you?
All the verbs are in the present. There is an apparent degree of formal connection between them, a way in which the first tense conditions all the others.
It would be quite strange if the conversation had been:
Speaker 1: Right, who’s going to arrange the transport?
Well, someone had gotta do it.
Speaker 2: I shan’t have been going to.
Speaker 2: Don’t! Come on, will you?
Well, someone had gotta do it.
Speaker 2: I shan’t have been going to.
Speaker 2: Don’t! Come on, will you?
ii. Parallelism
Another link in discourse is created by parallelism, a device which effects a connection simply by repeating the form of the sentences/clauses
e.g.
Pregnant women get emotional very easily. They get emotional if you raise your voice at them. They get emotional if you do something romantic. They get emotional if you notice they are eating a lot. They get emotional if you tell them they look beautiful. They get emotional if you are too protective. They get emotional if you are not protective enough.
What links the sentences in the above discourse?
Parallelism is often used in speeches, prayers, poetry and advertisements. It can have a powerful emotional effect, and it is also very useful as a memory aid.
Parallelism, which achieves cohesion by an echo of form, is not restricted to grammatical form.
e.g.
A.
Georgie Porgie pudding and pie
Kissed the girls and made them cry
When the boys came out to play
Georgie Porgie ran away
A.
Georgie Porgie pudding and pie
Kissed the girls and made them cry
When the boys came out to play
Georgie Porgie ran away
B.
Speaker 1: We would like to take this opportunity to wish you the best of luck
Speaker 2: Go break a leg man!
Speaker 1: We would like to take this opportunity to wish you the best of luck
Speaker 2: Go break a leg man!
iii. Referring expressions
The meanings of some words can be decoded only by referring to other words or elements of the context which are clear to both the speaker and listener.
The most obvious example of this are third person pronouns – she/her/hers/herself , he/him/his/himself, it/its/itself
Sometimes, more than a knowledge of the meaning of the word is necessary to decipher the meanings of referring expressions
e.g.
Then they burnt it.
Referring expressions can be anaphoric, cataphoric or exophoric
Then they burnt it.
Referring expressions can be anaphoric, cataphoric or exophoric
Anaphoric references are those that refer back to elements mentioned earlier in the discourse. (ana means “upwards” and phor means “to carry.”)
e.g.
The passengers presented themselves for checking before boarding the plane.
Cataphoric references are those that refer to elements that are mentioned after them. (cata means ‘downwards’)
e.g.
This is what she said – our teacher is a raving lunatic!
Exophoric references are those that refer to elements outside the text. (exo means ‘outside’)
e.g.
Finally, on 7 May 1945, Germany surrendered to the Allied Forces
Finally, on 7 May 1945, Germany surrendered to the Allied Forces
iv. Repetition and lexical chains
The same sort of link as pronouns can be created by the repetition of words.
Native speakers are, however, often discouraged from repeating the same word as it is considered ‘bad style’. What is encouraged is ‘elegant repetition’ where synonyms or more general words/phrases are used.
e.g.
Dice the mangoes into large cubes. Arrange the diced mango cubes on a plate, in any pattern you like. Pour whipped cream over the diced mango cubes.
Referring expressions, repetitions and elegant repetitions all establish cohesion by creating ‘chains’ of connected words/clauses. Such lexical chains can also consist of words that associate with each other by virtue of some formal semantic connection.
e.g.
Four legs good. Two legs bad.
v. Substitution
Another type of cohesive device is the substitution of one word with another.
e.g.
Speaker 1: Which shirt shall I wear today?
Speaker 2: The maroon one.
Speaker 2: You also like that one then?
Speaker 1: Yes, I do! I think It suits you better.
Speaker 2: I think so too.
Speaker 1: Which shirt shall I wear today?
Speaker 2: The maroon one.
Speaker 2: You also like that one then?
Speaker 1: Yes, I do! I think It suits you better.
Speaker 2: I think so too.
vi. Ellipsis
Sometimes, it is not necessary to provide a substitution for a word/phrase which has already been mentioned. It is simply omitted, but can be reconstructed quite successfully.
Omitting part of a sentence on the assumption that an earlier sentence or context will make the meaning clear is known as ellipsis. Ellipsis is also referred to as ‘substitution by zero’.
e.g.
Speaker 1: Have you been shopping girls? What did you buy on your [shopping] spree?
Speaker 2: I bought jewelry and Zee [bought] clothes,
Speaker 3: Clothes? You already have more than enough [clothes], and you bought more [clothes]?
Speaker 2: I bought jewelry and Zee [bought] clothes,
Speaker 3: Clothes? You already have more than enough [clothes], and you bought more [clothes]?
vii. Conjunction
Conjunctions are another type of cohesive device. They draw explicit attention to the type of relation which exists between one sentence/clause and another.
e.g.
First, peel and clean the potatoes. Then bake them. A conventional oven is best. However, a microwave oven will also do. Potatoes burn easily, so make sure you keep a close watch on the timer!
All of the elements/aspects mentioned are also the ones that we learnt in our Discourse Analysis course (ENGL 4635) under the tutelage of Dr. Haja Mohideen, few semesters back. Hence, we think that it is important to include in this section.
We hope you are enlightened by what we share here, stay tune with the next entries for more info rmation on Discourse Analysis module.
Till then,
Wassalam.
Source taken from:
http://www.azlifa.com/discourse-and-pragmatics-lecture-1/
All of the elements/aspects mentioned are also the ones that we learnt in our Discourse Analysis course (ENGL 4635) under the tutelage of Dr. Haja Mohideen, few semesters back. Hence, we think that it is important to include in this section.
We hope you are enlightened by what we share here, stay tune with the next entries for more info rmation on Discourse Analysis module.
Till then,
Wassalam.
Source taken from:
http://www.azlifa.com/discourse-and-pragmatics-lecture-1/
No comments:
Post a Comment